The Stupid Merely Burns….But Jennifer Drew Flames Like White Phosphorus

Yes, this would be yet another post on the sheer assholery and crankery of right-wing radical “feminist” thought. As much as I would like to cease discussing them, they always seem to top themselves in total asshattery.

Latest case in point: this latest bomb thrown by Jennifer Drew as a comment to another post favoring Jacqui Smith’s anti-sex work legislation in Great Britain and Scotland.

JENNIFER DREW said…

Strange how the pro-prostitution lobby always ‘appear’ whenever an article is written daring to challenge men’s supposed inalienable and innate right of sexual access to women’s and girls’ bodies.

Even stranger is the fact other posts concerning men’s violence against women are consistently ignored by the pro-porn lobbyists. Could it because the belief it is a man’s right to buy women and girls for the purpose of raping and masturbating into their bodies supercedes any other form of male violence against women and girls.

Or could it be these pro-prostitution and pro-porners have nothing better to do than constantly attack anyone who dares to challenge the myth of male sex right to women and children.

15 January 2009 10:11

Let’s forget for a moment about the fact that this comment was done in reaction to remarks from actual WOMEN (including, of course, Caroline Shepard), that no men actually managed to post a comment there in the first place.

And, I’m not going to (at least not this time) attempt a full response from the sex worker POV, since I’m not coming from that perspective.  (Besides, Ren Ev, as usual, has done the job with her usual dispatch, anyway. And also here, too.)

Instead, I will take the perspective that I know most about….that of a man whom has never entered a titty bar or a brothel, but who has seen and bought plenty of porn, and who has been accused greatly of being a part of the “pro-prostitution/pro-porn lobby”.

Being that as it may, allow me to take on Ms. Drew point for point, shall we???

Strange how the pro-prostitution lobby always ‘appear’ whenever an article is written daring to challenge men’s supposed inalienable and innate right of sexual access to women’s and girls’ bodies.

From the jump….yeah, the “pro-prostitution lobby”…..since anyone who doesn’t wish to demonize every man who visits a brothel or joins a porn site or otherwise thinks of a woman as a subject for his sexual fantasies is obviously a paid tool of the “prostitution lobby.  Gee, I didn’t know that Caroline Shepherd was a man, or that she was even paid anything to oppose Jacqui Smith’s legislation.  For that matter, if I’m that much of a freakin’ lobbyist, where’s my check from Dennis Hof or Douglas Fox?? If I’m going to be such a lobbyist, shouldn’t I be compensated for my work??

And then there is this “men’s supposed and inalienable right of sexual access to women’s and girl’s bodies” thing. Funny, but I’ve never heard of even the most radical “pro-prostitution lobbyist” ever say that ALL women should be coerced to give up their bodies to ANY man at the drop of a hat….I have heard a prominent right-wingnut, though, suggest that wives should make themselves totally sexually available to their husbands even when they are not in the mood for it. Oh..but Dennis Prager isn’t a “pro-prostitution lobbyist”, but in fact an opponent of sex workers who would support anti-prostitution legislation like Ms. Smith’s???

I guess that Jennifer must mean that since women don’t (or shouldn’t) EVER initiate sexual conduct with men (or girls initiate the same with boys), it is always the man’s fault when sex happens, and it’s always the man who wants access to a woman’s body for sexual reasons.  Never mind that women are quite capable of wanting sex for themselves and might even want the same level of sexual access to the man’s body for her own purposes.  Oh, noooos……women are too pure, too intimate to think of sex that way!!! Only those evol MEN would ever reduce sex to such a vile, degrading act of physical pleasure, done just to get themselves off at women’s expense!! It must be the patriarchy sending all those evil senses of pleasure onto these women to keep them jailed into submission and silence!!!

So..what does that say about all those women who actually have orgasms and own them as their own?? I guess to Ms. Drew, they must be either stupid “cumdumpsters” or merely tools of men….either way, they aren’t real women as she and her true feminists are with their superior intimacy. Or, so they think.

Even stranger is the fact other posts concerning men’s violence against women are consistently ignored by the pro-porn lobbyists. Could it because the belief it is a man’s right to buy women and girls for the purpose of raping and masturbating into their bodies supercedes any other form of male violence against women and girls.

So…according to Ms. Jennifer, we “pro-porn” pozzies are actually ignorant of, if not fully supportive of, violence against women (of course, porn in her mind being “violence against women” in that the mere illustration of  the introduction of an erect penis into a woman’s vagina or mouth or anal cavity amounts to prima facie rape
of ALL women) because we are so obsessed with getting into the panties of every women we see.

Yeah.  Right. Really. So, if such “pro-porn” men actually protest actual rape and actual violence by supporting tougher criminal penalties against actual rapists and other abusers of women and girls (and men and boys, too), would that matter much to her?? Or…if “pro-prostitution lobbyist” men actually worked to help women who were abused within the sex industry to get out and get financial and social resources to rebuild their lives in some level of safety and sanity….would that assuage her objections to us??

Of course not….because when you cut through all the bullshit, it becomes perfectly clear that folk like Ms. Drew could care less about actual women being hurt by the policies she is espousing or the laws she is supporting…it’s all about, for her, getting back at men for “masturbating into women’s bodies”.

I guess that for her, a woman should be nothing more than a useless dildo, cold and unreacting and never seeking any bit of personal pleasure for herself from having a erect penis inside her. I mean…if that says a lot about her open disgust at men, then what does it say even more about her even stronger (if thinly veiled) disgust and loathing for the WOMEN whom actually LIKE having a willing and erect penis inside them, and who actually react with pleasure to a man who is willing to serve them sexually and play to their desires??

In other words, it’s  not about the violence or the rape with Madame Jennifer and her allies; it’s about the SEX. Especially, the kind of sex that most women willingly want and consensually have with men.

Or could it be these pro-prostitution and pro-porners have nothing better to do than constantly attack anyone who dares to challenge the myth of male sex right to women and children.

Or…it actually may be that we “pro-porners” and “pro-prostitution” folk are simply sick and tired of being smeared as rapists and pedophiles for accepting women’s sexual autonomy and for defending her choices and her rights and responsibilities to think and act for herself. And,  just maybe, it could be that the “myth” of “male sex right to women and children” (Hmmm….now it’s “children”?? What, is Jennifer slipping?? I thought that only girls were deserving of protection; are boys now as much a victim as girls?? Or is that chalked up to the evil of male homosexuality???) is merely a figment of her imagination, used as a club to beat down women who might think that THEY, not the GenderBorg (or the patriarchy), should decide for themselves whom they should engage in sex with.

How interesting that most men who view porn or who actually frequent brothels actually have a more human, more respectful, and fuller respect for women they fantasize about having sex with, than the supposed “feminists” who want to “protect” them from all the “evil rapists” and “misogynists”? And guess who are the ones throwing out the “feminst creds” cards???

Yep, I’m with Ren here….same song, 1,456th verse.  And deserving of the same refrain in response.

Memo to Jennifer Drew: The tall STFU glass and the SYAD bowl are waiting for you at the SmackDog Smackdown Hotel. Like it or don’t…I don’t particularly care anymore.


VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share